Arab Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume 10, Issue 4, Supplement , Pages S12-S16, April 2010

Potential novel biomarkers for monitoring the fibrogenic process in liver

  • Axel M. Gressner

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry – Central Laboratory, RWTH-University Hospital Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Mohamed Rizk

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry – Central Laboratory, RWTH-University Hospital Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
  • ,
  • Chunfang Gao

      Affiliations

    • Department of Laboratory Medicine, Eastern Hepatobiliary Hospital (EHBH), Second Military Medical University, 225 Shanghai Road, Shanghai 200438, China
  • ,
  • Olav A. Gressner

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry – Central Laboratory, RWTH-University Hospital Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany

published online 18 January 2010.

Abstract 

The clinical course of chronic liver diseases is significantly dependent on the progression rate of fibrosis, that is, the unstructured replacement of injured parenchyma by extracellular matrix. Fibrogenesis (i.e., the development of fibrosis) can be regarded as an unlimited wound-healing process, which is based on matrix synthesis in activated hepatic stellate cells, fibroblasts and, potentially, by hepatocytes and biliary epithelial cells converted to (myo-)fibroblasts. Blood biomarkers of fibrogenesis and fibrosis can be divided into class I and class II. Class I biomarkers are single tests, which are based on the pathophysiology of fibrosis, whereas class II biomarkers are mostly multiparametric algorithms, which have been statistically evaluated with regard to the detection and follow-up of fibrosis. None of the presently available approach fulfils the criteria of an ideal test, but increased understanding of the pathogenesis of fibrosis offers additional ways for pathophysiologically well-based biomarkers. These include transforming growth factor (TGF)-β-driven marker proteins, bone-marrow-derived cells (fibrocytes) and cytokines, which govern pro- and anti-fibrotic activities. Proteomic and glycomic approaches of serum are under investigation to set up specific protein profiles in patients with liver fibrosis. These and other novel parameters will supplement liver biopsy/histology, high-resolution imaging analysis and elastography for the detection and monitoring of patients with liver fibrosis.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1687-1979(09)00316-5

doi:10.1016/j.ajg.2009.12.009

Arab Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume 10, Issue 4, Supplement , Pages S12-S16, April 2010